But what is "quintessentially R.E.M."?
Personally, from Pageant onwards I think the only thing you can really pinpoint as fitting that phrase is Michaels voice and a fondness for mid tempo tracks, such is the diversity of the music. I honestly think if you took the uninitiated and played them the bands catalogue without any sort of vocals, they'd probably assume there was about 7 or 8 different bands on show.
So what is the benchmark sound that people refer to when making this claim?
The IRS years are the most consistent style-wise, displaying a coherent progression as opposed to change in terms of sound, but is it right that this would be considered the "typical" R.E.M. sound? I mean, in terms of the length of the period, it barely equates to a quarter of their career (although output takes it up to a third of their career). This period also ended 24 years ago.
We then have the early 90's/WB period up to Automatic. Probably their most remembered period, but in terms of it being "Quintessentially R.E.M.", how can that judgement be made over such a short period of their career? Particularly as OOT/Automatic sound so different musically.
We then have Monster, which was *almost* as though the band pretended to be someone else for a few years (very successfully I might add). Surely that album cannot be considered "quintessentially R.E.M." in a musical sense?
New Adventures certainly shows coherence in terms of it seemingly drawing together the two extremes of Automatic and Monster, but as I don't believe either of those albums to be "quintessentially R.E.M."in the first place, how can New Adventures be?
Take away Michael from UP, and you have an album that doesn't on the whole really sound like anyone before or after.
Reveal takes a few cues from UP while still sounding completely different, but again is very unique in the bands catalogue.
ATS added to the equation, does serve in someway of bringing UP & Reveal together in a sort of (extremely) loose trilogy period musically, but begins to move away from lush production and electronica of the previous two albums. Again, not a period I can imagine many would single out as being "quintessentially R.E.M.".
Accelerate's a strange one as it seems to be simultaneously lauded as R.E.M. going back to their roots, while rather paradoxically (certainly IMHO) sounding very little like their "roots".
CiN seems to show the best snapshot of the most recognizable song styles throughout their first 20years, but that period being so diverse, it's still difficult to pick a quintessential musical style from it.
So what is is "quintessentially R.E.M.", and how can WAGBTWWB and the other two new songs be judged against it?
Is it Michaels voice/melodies/lyrics?
Is it a particular era, album or song?
A particular musical style?
Can it even be equated?
I personally don't think that WAGBTWWB sounds anything like R.E.M. musically, but then the problem is, I can apply that to most of their catalogue and the reality is I have no idea what I'm really judging against.
I'm confused
Any ideas?










