112 replies to this topic

[Sweet Fanny Addams]

OneArpeggioPete said:

not if you use them to feed up the mop-kitties...

But that's the beauty of it! That way the bunny wabbits do double duty and go that mile further! Mop AND kitten food all in one adorable package. It's eco friendly and economical! Also, you can try warped breeding experiments with them if you're a headcase.

[OneArpeggioPete]

*nods* i hear ya... add some fish genes for a scrubby side...

:-)

oneArpeggiopete:cool:

[Sweet Fanny Addams]

kitten says "assume the position, bitch"
















Oh God I feel so guilty.

[OneArpeggioPete]

little easter lambkins are excellent for removing spider webs in awkward corners when you push a broomstick up their backside, btw...

:-)

oneArpeggiopete:cool:

[stiperules!ok]

OneArpeggioPete said:

the old-fashioned way sure as hell is more fun...

:-)

oneArpeggiopete:cool:

Probably not for the scientists, though.

[slinky1]

stiperules!ok said:

Probably not for the scientists, though.

oh I think scientists still think the old fashioned way is more fun:p

[In the Corner]

slinky1 said:

oh I think scientists still think the old fashioned way is more fun:p

Ooooo, frisky, Dr Slinkster!

[Tronyé]

Thread closeted.

[Driver Eight]

pebbles said:

What circumstances are you thinking of?

Haven't mapped it out. Have heard discussions in some media outlets of allowing couple to gender balance their kids. I prefer leaving it to random chance but can't get too worked up about the issue. What do you think?

As to the person who said screening for genetically diseased embryos would involve aborting them, I don't know it that's true or not. I don't know enough about the details of the process of IVF, incubation, screening and implanting into the gestating mother. I think most people oppose abortion except in the case of stark necessity (and some entirely or nearly so, needless to say). Some ppl oppose the idea of genetically screening embryos. To me, at least, if I knew a child were going to suffer due to a genetically inherited illness and could choose, with a partner, to bring another, healthier child into the world, I'd choose for health and no suffering (or less suffering at least - we all suffer at least a little in life). I understand others might choose differently.

[stiperules!ok]

Christratton2007 said:

I think most people oppose abortion except in the case of stark necessity (and some entirely or nearly so, needless to say).

You are SO wrong. A helluva lot of people are in favour of abortion on demand as a 'woman's choice'. Mostly, 'stark necessity' doesn't even come close to entering the equation.

[isilida 32]

i think people are more in favor of a woman's choice to have an abortion if she so desires. i'm not sure they're actually in favor of abortion though.

[Driver Eight]

stiperules!ok said:

You are SO wrong. A helluva lot of people are in favour of abortion on demand as a 'woman's choice'. Mostly, 'stark necessity' doesn't even come close to entering the equation.

I am wholly in support of a woman's right to choose an abortion, except in the final trimester, as the US law now stands. I agree with you that, per public opinion polls, most people in the US hold that opinion. Do I think that right should be used except in extreme cases? No, but I support wide availabilty of the morning after pill, that's for sure.

Edited by Christratton2007, 17 April 2009 - 09:49 AM.
diction

[stiperules!ok]

I support use of the morning after pill, but not abortion, although I realise that a lot of people will say that the morning after pill is abortion.

Edited by stiperules!ok, 17 April 2009 - 09:41 AM.