View Full Version : Did Michael really post on guyswithiphones????
mobileschirping
07-12-2009, 02:27 PM
WTF????
http://guyswithiphones.com/post/057365/
check out the pic before and the 2 after, clearly the same bathroom.
Derek
07-12-2009, 03:06 PM
WTF????
http://guyswithiphones.com/post/057365/
check out the pic before and the 2 after, clearly the same bathroom.
That's him and his lover.
fanfan
07-12-2009, 03:25 PM
LOL; Michael posting another bathroom pic.
Leilani
07-12-2009, 04:55 PM
michael has a tattoo on his right arm. so i think there is no use to discuss whether or not it is him. however this won't matter at all even if it's him.
The photo is taken in a mirror - either that or he's had his legs amputated about 3 inches below the waist!
Leilani
07-12-2009, 05:12 PM
I'm thinking is their homage to Michael Jackson's Man in the Mirror!
stipeeyes
07-12-2009, 05:50 PM
Yeah it's a picture of him shirtless. And yes he still has a hot sexy body. Why is that such a surprise? HELLO we've all seen him bare chested in photos and on stage. And he's posed in his underwear before and even dropped his pants in New York in 04. mustafalogy why wouldn't it be him, don't you know his face by now? It's not like he's completely naked because that's the only way I could understand why anyone would think it's not his body.
edu11salazar
07-12-2009, 07:59 PM
WTF! HAHAHAHA Michael is insane xD
how did you get these pics on that page?:eek:
Hezalin
07-12-2009, 08:08 PM
what's really funny, is the pics after that of his BF and a thrird party hangning out definitely naked. That website is pretty dang hilarious.
stipeeyes
07-12-2009, 08:34 PM
That second guy is not Thomas like it says, that's some other guy. And he already has taken similar photos like this of himself on futerpicenter. The photo where he has the full beard and his chest is much hairier and he's in his bathroom.
Michael's the only one on that page that actually has a decent body.
musicbrain_5
07-12-2009, 08:48 PM
Michael's the only one on that page that actually has a decent body.
Seconded. :cool: Some of the comments below the pictures are hilarious as well :D
Derek
07-12-2009, 09:23 PM
Yeah it's a picture of him shirtless. And yes he still has a hot sexy body. Why is that such a surprise? HELLO we've all seen him bare chested in photos and on stage. And he's posed in his underwear before and even dropped his pants in New York in 04. mustafalogy why wouldn't it be him, don't you know his face by now? It's not like he's completely naked because that's the only way I could understand why anyone would think it's not his body.
He looks like he's in better shape and a lot healthier than he has been in the past five years.
Derek
07-12-2009, 09:25 PM
Michael's the only one on that page that actually has a decent body.
Nah, dude, all the dudes showing off their junk are gym rats.
I don't know what all of you are talking about...but that web page is too interesting:D,Michael is a plus...
oonaoneill
07-13-2009, 03:57 AM
supercool michael! LOVE YOU
but in the next pic hesn't thomas...
lotus eater
07-13-2009, 04:54 AM
I really like the picture, I think that Michael still have a fantastic chest and the bathroom he is in is really nice, I wouldn't mind mine looking like that.
Hezalin
07-13-2009, 05:10 AM
That second guy is not Thomas like it says, that's some other guy. And he already has taken similar photos like this of himself on futerpicenter. The photo where he has the full beard and his chest is much hairier and he's in his bathroom.
Michael's the only one on that page that actually has a decent body.
you are kidding, right? there are quite a few fine specimens of the male physique on there. QUITE A FEW! LOL
Derek
07-13-2009, 05:54 AM
you are kidding, right? there are quite a few fine specimens of the male physique on there. QUITE A FEW! LOL
Word, psychosis knows no bounds.
Queen of Comedy
07-13-2009, 09:00 AM
Now I understand why Marc Jacobs wanted him as a model: he is SUPERNATURAL SUPERSEXY, WOW!:D
renee
07-13-2009, 10:50 AM
he exudes sex appeal, more than any man i know. always has. when he sings its even more sexier. oomph.
In the Corner
07-13-2009, 12:06 PM
Seconded. :cool: Some of the comments below the pictures are hilarious as well :D
The comments about "is it? not it's not? yes it is!" are really funny. That IS a sleazy website though. Ick.
musicbrain_5
07-13-2009, 12:09 PM
The comments about "is it? not it's not? yes it is!" are really funny. That IS a sleazy website though. Ick.
I think any website like that is sleazy, but they're also guilty pleasures for some people :rolleyes:
In the Corner
07-13-2009, 12:12 PM
I think any website like that is sleazy, but they're also guilty pleasures for some people :rolleyes:
True, and I've seen sleazier websites, after all. Nothing wrong with it, if that's one's cup of tea.
Orange Crush 79
07-13-2009, 03:10 PM
FYC, this NSFW gay porn site posted a bunch of photos directly comparing Michael and his boyfriend with the GuysWithiPhone pics... thought it might help crack the mystery...
http://www.queerclick.com/archive/2009/07/is_michael_stipe_on_guyswithiphonescom.php
stipeeyes
07-13-2009, 03:53 PM
I agree Renee. You know Michael only did this to see what kind of reaction he would get. :D
you are kidding, right? there are quite a few fine specimens of the male physique on there. QUITE A FEW! LOL
Don't tell me you like the third one down in the same shower, with all that hairy mess on his face, LOL!
wagtail
07-13-2009, 06:35 PM
Word, psychosis knows no bounds.
I must be suffering the same psychosis. I much prefer scrawny and sinewy to buffed and muscular.
I gotta admit Stipey is pretty hot in that pic....he has good definition in that place above the thigh/below the hip that doesn't seem to have a name but is the single most attractive part of the male anatomy
...anyway, he looks good to me. I might have to join the Michael Stipe Chest Hair Appreciation Society Inc.
oh and speaking of guys with iPhones/iBoners here's the cartoon from last weekends Melbourne Age:
http://www.murmurs.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=75537&stc=1&d=1247535229
I must be suffering the same psychosis. I much prefer scrawny and sinewy to buffed and muscular.
I gotta admit Stipey is pretty hot in that pic....he has good definition in that place above the thigh/below the hip that doesn't seem to have a name but is the single most attractive part of the male anatomy
...anyway, he looks good to me. I might have to join the Michael Stipe Chest Hair Appreciation Society Inc.
oh and speaking of guys with iPhones/iBoners here's the cartoon from last weekends Melbourne Age:
http://www.murmurs.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=75537&stc=1&d=1247535229
funny!!!!jajjaja!!
Why do gays like so much the technology????good for a new thread...
musicbrain_5
07-13-2009, 07:25 PM
That's a great cartoon!
Why do gays like so much the technology????good for a new thread...
Who knows lol
stipeeyes
07-13-2009, 08:18 PM
I must be suffering the same psychosis. I much prefer scrawny and sinewy to buffed and muscular.
I gotta admit Stipey is pretty hot in that pic....he has good definition in that place above the thigh/below the hip that doesn't seem to have a name but is the single most attractive part of the male anatomy
...anyway, he looks good to me. I might have to join the Michael Stipe Chest Hair Appreciation Society Inc.
Well at least I'm not alone. But it's Stipechosis. :D
Oh that place. It's usually called davids I think. Yeah there isn't a whole lot of masculinity if a man has a hairless chest to me.
There are some others new photos. Now it's time for Andy LeMaster, the lead singer of indie band Now It's Overheard (always in the Stipe's bathroom).
What a party! :D
Rella
07-14-2009, 03:37 AM
I gotta admit Stipey is pretty hot in that pic....he has good definition in that place above the thigh/below the hip that doesn't seem to have a name but is the single most attractive part of the male anatomy
that'd be in italian "tagli da monta", something like "covering cuts"...
;)
Hunnybabe
07-14-2009, 06:40 AM
Is it just me or is the one with the ass showing a women? Perez hilton is having a field day with this BTW ;) Wish I'd been to that party!
Hezalin
07-14-2009, 07:17 AM
I agree Renee. You know Michael only did this to see what kind of reaction he would get. :D
Don't tell me you like the third one down in the same shower, with all that hairy mess on his face, LOL!
I am a facial ahir kinda of girl, for the most part, I jsut meant in general. I looked thriugh about 1`0 apges of pics there.
stipeeyes
07-14-2009, 06:08 PM
Is it just me or is the one with the ass showing a women? Perez hilton is having a field day with this BTW ;) Wish I'd been to that party!
Yeah that is a woman. I'm sure there are some of those guys who don't mind looking at either. A pal told me that the Perez site is having a field day about this. And apparently people think that is Michael's bathroom and a photo of a young boy around 13 was sent in and that is going to create some problems for Michael. So he may have to make a statement and confirm that it's not his bathroom. But if the site is showing young boys it's time it be shut down.
musicbrain_5
07-14-2009, 06:38 PM
Is it just me or is the one with the ass showing a women? Perez hilton is having a field day with this BTW ;) Wish I'd been to that party!
You know Perez Hilton is in love with Michael :p
stipeeyes
07-14-2009, 06:54 PM
Michael submitted this pic to Perezhilton.com
http://img.perezhilton.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/remxxx_02__oPt.jpgHe's looks crazy in that wig.
I know that counter top, seen that in pics before. But it's sad to see comments that say, "Stipe likes his young boys". Looks like he's going to be made to regret posting that pic.
wagtail
07-14-2009, 06:57 PM
that'd be in italian "tagli da monta", something like "covering cuts"...
;)
well there ya go... I should have known the Italians would have that sorted.
Yeah that is a woman. I'm sure there are some of those guys who don't mind looking at either. A pal told me that the Perez site is having a field day about this. And apparently people think that is Michael's bathroom and a photo of a young boy around 13 was sent in and that is going to create some problems for Michael. So he may have to make a statement and confirm that it's not his bathroom. But if the site is showing young boys it's time it be shut down.
Dol mentioned that there is some pics of Andy from Now It's Overhead on there. If so, he just looks very young...or he did last time I saw a photo of him. Anyhow, I have no idea how old he actually is, but he's not a 'young boy' and he's not 13.
goldberry
07-14-2009, 07:21 PM
Ha ha, thanks for this. I'm not sure why people would want to give Perez Hilton or his site time of day (though people do), but good pix from Michael.
pebbles
07-14-2009, 07:30 PM
I was wondering if the thread or the link could have a "NSFW" warning or something to that effect letting people know what they are looking at?
I had no idea this was a porn site. When I clicked to see the picture of the lead singer of my fave band, there was an ad beside his post that was really, really pornographic. Also when I clicked the "next post" button it looked like a lot of them are really explicit too. Reading the comments in the thread, I can see the indicators - too late! :eek:
stipeeyes
07-14-2009, 08:07 PM
I know Pebbles until now I never even heard of this site but than again I don't go searching for gay men's websites either. For the most part it looks like it's just guys posing nude with the porno ads on the side. Well I know Michael has always been fond of nude photos and I sure do think he did mean it when he used to tell the audience to get naked.
well there ya go... I should have known the Italians would have that sorted.
Dol mentioned that there is some pics of Andy from Now It's Overhead on there. If so, he just looks very young...or he did last time I saw a photo of him. Anyhow, I have no idea how old he actually is, but he's not a 'young boy' and he's not 13.
I was informed. but honestly that guy looks like a teenager in the picture I saw. I didn't recognize him at all. He really needs to do something to man up a bit. I saw him 5 years ago when they opened for R.E.M. and people in the audience thought they were watching a child perform because he looks insanely young for his age. We all know he's an adult but people who aren't too much informed about Michael or his friends do think that is a boy and Michael is now being accused of having a fetish for young boys which pisses me off. So that is Michael's or a friend's shower than.
Michael must be bored or something. He could always get the album moving along quicker.;)
wagtail
07-14-2009, 08:12 PM
I don't think someone should 'man up' as a response to the ignorance of other people. As an artist his skills speak for themselves, he's incredibly talented.
If he wants to put pics of himself up on the net, then I'm sure he realised people were going to comment, same goes for Stipe.
So anyway, Michael Stipe hosts "guys gone wild", he's either having a great laugh about it, or he's an idiot...I'm pretty sure it's not the latter, ya know.
stipeeyes
07-14-2009, 08:23 PM
:DI don't think someone should 'man up' as a response to the ignorance of other people. As an artist his skills speak for themselves, he's incredibly talented.
So anyway, Michael Stipe hosts "guys gone wild", he's either having a great laugh about it, or he's an idiot...I'm pretty sure it's not the latter, ya know.
Very true. I have one album but I thought they were kind of boring live but we all have our own tastes.
Yeah I don't think Michael is an idiot. But I do agree with Pebbles that there should be some kind of warning that yeah there are naked men with boners and some of the conservatives may not appreciate that. I mean you see the site and you think hey it's just men with phones and what a surprise you get. LOL! But going by the comments Michael has made some people very happy and they want to see the rest of him. :D
:D
Dol mentioned that there is some pics of Andy from Now It's Overhead on there. If so, he just looks very young...or he did last time I saw a photo of him. Anyhow, I have no idea how old he actually is, but he's not a 'young boy' and he's not 13.
Yes, and again the photos comes from Perez (I don't have search on "that" site :p).
Anyway here (http://perezhilton.com/2009-07-14-michael-stipe-loves-naked-men-in-his-bathroom) is Andy...
surprisepig!
07-15-2009, 02:09 AM
So this is why the album is not out until 2011. Dammit Stipe, do some work you lazy bastard or I'l do to you hat I did to Michael Jackson.
j/k
goldberry
07-15-2009, 04:20 AM
I'm over new REM albums anyway, they ain't getting much better. Glory days were up to around 1993.
Happy for Stipey to go in new directions.
musicbrain_5
07-15-2009, 04:33 AM
I'm over new REM albums anyway, they ain't getting much better. Glory days were up to around 1993.
Happy for Stipey to go in new directions.
What about Monster?
Rella
07-15-2009, 04:41 AM
What about Monster?
yeah, and what about New adventures???
NewToREM
07-15-2009, 12:24 PM
And what about Accelerate? :confused:
Up :(
Reveal :(
Around The Sun :(
Accelerate :D
musicbrain_5
07-15-2009, 12:28 PM
And what about Accelerate? :confused:
Up :(
Reveal :(
Around The Sun :(
Accelerate :D
Good analysis ;)
stipeeyes
07-15-2009, 05:30 PM
I'm over new REM albums anyway, they ain't getting much better. Glory days were up to around 1993.
Well they didn't even put out an album in 1993. And were those days up because that's your opinion or is it because the albums didn't sale a lot? Many great albums are never top sellers anyway.
The only album to me that wasn't the greatest was ATS, but it still has some stand out moments.:)
goldberry
07-16-2009, 09:49 PM
I liked NAIHF (96), and also "Monster" to a lesser degree ('94), but I guess their commercial and creative peak was probably around 1993 when "Automatic" was really taking hold in public consciousness.
stipeeyes
07-17-2009, 07:14 PM
Who cares about public success. They are happy enough with their hardcore fans. I'm sure Peter could care less if they ever have a commercial hit again. :)
goldberry
07-18-2009, 07:07 AM
He couldn't care less?
Well fair enough then. That'd be the correct attitude. Despite my love of Automatic, my real fondness is in the IRS years.
Ophelia
07-18-2009, 11:09 AM
Whoah... I did not need to see that website, lol!
stipeeyes
07-18-2009, 05:58 PM
Ophelia, you needed to see that. :p Well just for one purpose really.
He couldn't care less?
Well fair enough then. That'd be the correct attitude. Despite my love of Automatic, my real fondness is in the IRS years.
I say that because of the fact that Peter when he's playing shows with The Minus 5, or Robyn Hitchcock, they are basically playing some hole in the wall clubs and charging 20 dollars a ticket which really isn't much profit. They played in my old neighborhood where I never thought I would ever see anyone famous appear in that area, let alone a guy in my favorite band. All I'll say is growing up I was really poor and the neighborhood is still kind of a poor area. They tried to make the area a cool hip College student residency but some of those people have no clue how hard it was to grow up in that neighborhood when it wasn't so cool. I can still see Peter crossing that Street, getting into a van and the van driving down a Street I walked on almost everyday.
Ophelia
07-18-2009, 08:38 PM
Ophelia, you needed to see that. :p Well just for one purpose really.
LOL! Eewie!
Martine
07-19-2009, 10:05 AM
OK, the guy has a nice body. He is just SO not my type!
:p
IloveMichael
07-21-2009, 11:28 AM
"Why do gays like so much the technology????good for a new thread..."
Because they all are so intelligent, smart and the list keep going :p
isilida 32
07-21-2009, 08:05 PM
more than likely it's because most of them have more disposable income. not having a kid will free up income in big big ways.
stipeeyes
07-21-2009, 08:41 PM
"Why do gays like so much the technology????good for a new thread..."
A thread about that would make absolutely no sense.
Um Most people like new Technology. Unless somehow we are all gay. As for income most Men and Women with children have either one or several computers, game systems and cell phones in their houses. And just about every Kid is very into the latest Technology.
isilida 32
07-22-2009, 09:06 PM
how much of that is the norm though? how many men and women with children actually have all that? i'd say the numbers are not near as big as you're making out. to have several computers and game systems for example is a luxury. especially in these trying times.
stipeeyes
07-23-2009, 05:55 PM
how much of that is the norm though? how many men and women with children actually have all that? i'd say the numbers are not near as big as you're making out. to have several computers and game systems for example is a luxury. especially in these trying times.
I see people many younger than I with blackberry's and Iphones all the time. Just about everyone has some sort of cell phone. And to say that all gay people don't have children isn't true and to say that they all have money is also not true. In America many people spend a thousand dollars on just one child for Christmas, which is insane but some do it. That's all it's about here is material things. And you don't have to own every piece of new technology to know about it.
As for Michael he can afford all the latest things because he is a rich man and we all made him that way. And I'm sure he hasn't forgotten that. ;)
wagtail
07-24-2009, 04:04 AM
I see people many younger than I with blackberry's and Iphones all the time. Just about everyone has some sort of cell phone. And to say that all gay people don't have children isn't true and to say that they all have money is also not true. In America many people spend a thousand dollars on just one child for Christmas, which is insane but some do it. That's all it's about here is material things. And you don't have to own every piece of new technology to know about it.
As for Michael he can afford all the latest things because he is a rich man and we all made him that way. And I'm sure he hasn't forgotten that. ;)
Don't be silly, Denise, everyone knows that all the straight multi-million dollar rock stars are still using these:
http://www.dialaphone.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/oldcellphones4_18_06_08.jpg
Hezalin
07-24-2009, 06:50 AM
Don't be silly, Denise, everyone knows that all the straight multi-million dollar rock stars are still using these:
http://www.dialaphone.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/oldcellphones4_18_06_08.jpg
Gads, I remember therm, flashbacksa to Sixteen candles and farmer Ted. LOL
musicbrain_5
07-24-2009, 07:27 AM
Don't be silly, Denise, everyone knows that all the straight multi-million dollar rock stars are still using these:
http://www.dialaphone.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/oldcellphones4_18_06_08.jpg
I think my parents had something similar to that in the 90's when I was a kid. A car phone :D
stipeeyes
07-24-2009, 09:14 PM
:D Wagtail, you're too funny.
In the Corner
07-25-2009, 07:02 AM
I think my parents had something similar to that in the 90's when I was a kid. A car phone :D
I actually remember using a real car phone back in, hmm, 1971 I think it was. As in a phone that was attached to the car. Not sure of the technology but I was tres impressed.
isilida 32
07-25-2009, 09:21 AM
I see people many younger than I with blackberry's and Iphones all the time. Just about everyone has some sort of cell phone. And to say that all gay people don't have children isn't true and to say that they all have money is also not true. In America many people spend a thousand dollars on just one child for Christmas, which is insane but some do it. That's all it's about here is material things. And you don't have to own every piece of new technology to know about it.
As for Michael he can afford all the latest things because he is a rich man and we all made him that way. And I'm sure he hasn't forgotten that. ;)
i never used the word all.i wasn't talking about all people. just a sizable majority. and the same things can be said about single people or couples without kids of any sexuality. it's not inherent to just gay people. most single people or couples without kids tend to have more disposable income than those the who do have kids. sure, people spends thousands of dollars on kids for christmas. but how many of them can really afford it and how many of them are going broke spending that kind of money? cause i think kids are way more spoiled these days. i didn't know any kid growing up having a cell phone.
musicbrain_5
07-25-2009, 09:40 AM
Kids have no need for cell phones, really.
scrapkook
07-25-2009, 09:53 AM
Kids have no need for cell phones, really.
THANK you! I totally agree. I can see it for teenagers--Car trouble, etc., but in elementary school? Um, no. I had to take a cellphone away from a sixth-grader during choir this past year, and deal with a very mad mom when she had to come to school to pick it up. :D
In the Corner
07-25-2009, 10:33 AM
THANK you! I totally agree. I can see it for teenagers--Car trouble, etc., but in elementary school? Um, no. I had to take a cellphone away from a sixth-grader during choir this past year, and deal with a very mad mom when she had to come to school to pick it up. :D
Teens who drive need cell phones, but the others all consider them a necessity for keeping in constant touch with their friends through texting. Most kids at my school have nicer phones than I have. :rolleyes:
musicbrain_5
07-25-2009, 02:28 PM
THANK you! I totally agree. I can see it for teenagers--Car trouble, etc., but in elementary school? Um, no. I had to take a cellphone away from a sixth-grader during choir this past year, and deal with a very mad mom when she had to come to school to pick it up. :D
My brother is almost 11 and some of his classmates have phones! Even some kids who are younger than him! I think it's ridiculous. You're not supposed to have that kind of stuff in the school anyways - I never had to worry about that as there were no cell phones when I was in elementary school, but still. It's an unnecessary distraction in the classroom, and again, there is no reason for kids to have their own phones. I never had one and I survived!
Amanita
07-27-2009, 04:28 PM
yes. he did. so what?! He has a FANTASTIC body for a 49-year old (I wouldn't say no..! ) and I am pretty sure him and his friends had a blast doing these pics, just to shock everyone. Just the kinda Michael humour... ;) I wouldnt be surprised! LOL!!
I actually love that he is pretty open now.. hope to see you soon, gorgeous!!
Oowatanite
07-29-2009, 08:20 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uhoHoZ_yWLM 1:16 not an iPhone.
Uncle Remus
07-29-2009, 09:06 PM
Cell phones and iPods: The downfall of public education.
fanfan
07-30-2009, 05:52 AM
Cell phones and iPods: The downfall of public education.
That started earlier here - with private television channels making any attention span longer than 20 minutes non-existent.
oneeyelove
08-19-2009, 09:17 AM
Not my cup of tea but to each his own. How about recording another record now?
Ophelia
08-20-2009, 05:16 AM
Not my cup of tea but to each his own. How about recording another record now?
Hahahahahaha....
NicoleDec17too
09-22-2009, 07:05 PM
My eyes!!! The website had nude ads! I'm too young to see those!:eek:
stipeeyes
09-25-2009, 10:30 PM
My eyes!!! The website had nude ads! I'm too young to see those!:eek:
Your profile says you're 39?
NicoleDec17too
09-25-2009, 10:43 PM
Your profile says you're 39?
Yeah, so??? No, I was just kidding. ;) I am 39. :)
stiperules!ok
09-26-2009, 01:57 AM
Your profile says you're 39?
But that's WAY too young to see things like that!
Queen of Comedy
09-26-2009, 05:05 AM
It's strange, Michael exhibits his body in that crappy website and NOT on stage, where such a thing would be much more appreciated by fans :rolleyes: (and last year he was really too much dressed :rolleyes: )
stipeeyes
09-26-2009, 01:10 PM
It's strange, Michael exhibits his body in that crappy website and NOT on stage, where such a thing would be much more appreciated by fans :rolleyes: (and last year he was really too much dressed :rolleyes: )
I agree. He was certainly dressed too much. And well if you're going to pose on a site like that, you might as well take it all off. ;) He has nothing to be ashamed of. He obviously felt free to strip in Iconoclasts. That's a fun scene in the Van, I wonder if he always changes in vans. haha.
Ophelia
09-26-2009, 04:12 PM
I agree. He was certainly dressed too much. And well if you're going to pose on a site like that, you might as well take it all off. ;) He has nothing to be ashamed of. He obviously felt free to strip in Iconoclasts. That's a fun scene in the Van, I wonder if he always changes in vans. haha.
He looks hot in a suit. Seriously. And I love that black/white striped long sleeve he wears under the suit coat. :)
stiperules!ok
09-27-2009, 02:23 PM
I think he looks good dressed or naked. *pants loudly with tongue hanging out*
stipeeyes
09-27-2009, 06:47 PM
He looks hot in a suit. Seriously. And I love that black/white striped long sleeve he wears under the suit coat. :)
Me Too. I love his suits. But it was a summer tour and it was very hot and he had three layers of clothes on. Last tour the make up went away and the strip teases stopped. It's always been a Stipe tradition to shed layers. :)
stiperules!ok
09-29-2009, 02:52 AM
It's always been a Stipe tradition to shed layers. :)
Yes, and as he's kept himself fit enough, I don't really know why he's stopped. It's obviously something he just feels he's too old for. :(
stipeeyes
09-29-2009, 05:45 PM
Yes, and as he's kept himself fit enough, I don't really know why he's stopped. It's obviously something he just feels he's too old for. :(
Never too old. I guess he's just becoming more conservative(accept for when he poses on porn sites). :p
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.